Sample size
How many past instances a result is based on. A trend built on 5 games can look spectacular and mean nothing; the same trend over 300 games is worth attention. Small samples are the most common way bettors fool themselves.
ExampleA pitcher who’s 4–0 in day games tells you almost nothing — four games. A system that’s 210–150 across three seasons is a signal worth pricing. Same win rate, completely different meaning.
Sharp money
Wagers from professional, winning bettors, as opposed to the general public. When the money on a side outweighs the number of bets on it, it often signals sharp action — professionals betting bigger on the side the public is ignoring.
ExampleOne side draws 30% of the bets but 65% of the dollars: fewer, bigger, smarter wagers. When books move the line toward that side despite the bet count, they’re respecting the sharp money.
Sharpe ratio
A measure of return relative to how bumpy the ride was. Two strategies can both profit, but the one with steadier, more consistent results scores higher. It rewards reliability, not just raw return.
ExampleTwo models both finish +12 units. One grinded about +1 unit a week; the other swung ±15 units month to month. The steady one has the far higher Sharpe ratio — and is the one you’ll actually stick with.
Statistical significance (p-value)
A measure of whether a result is likely real or just luck. A low p-value means the pattern probably isn’t chance; a high one means there isn’t yet enough evidence to trust it. A 70% win rate over 10 bets is exciting but not significant; the same over 500 bets is meaningful.
ExampleA 7–3 heater has a p-value around 0.17 — easily luck. Going 290–210 over 500 bets has a p-value under 0.001 — almost certainly a real edge, not a hot streak.